Premium Domain Names for Sale at CrocoDom.com
Founded in 2000, venture capital (VC) firm Emerald Technology Ventures was among the first VCs to recognize the potential of sustainability investing, well before the terms “ESG” and “green investments” became mainstream.
In an interview with McKinsey’s Gisa Springer and Harry Forbes, Emerald’s founder and current managing partner, Gina Domanig, offers insights into Emerald’s journey. She discusses the fund’s experience in bridging the gap between start-ups and corporations, its approach to prudent business models, and its ability to navigate economic cycles without excessive cash burn.
Key insight #1: Funding innovation can drive sustainable technologies forward.
Gisa Springer: What inspired you to found Emerald Technology Ventures as a sustainability-focused fund?
Emerald Technology Ventures is a sustainability-focused venture capital firm focusing on cleantech investments in energy, water, and materials in more than 50 industrial corporations. The company manages about €650 million in assets in addition to a loan-guarantee program of 500 million Swiss francs for the Swiss government. Emerald has an international footprint, with offices in Singapore, Toronto, and Zurich.
Gina Domanig: In the 1990s, I was working at a large Swiss industrial company where we performed a substantial amount of scenario analysis as part of our M&A activity, and we saw a massive shift regarding climate change. I knew there would be many opportunities for sustainability in the industrial sector and that incumbents did not have the capacity to capture them on their own. After I left that company in 1999, I joined a sustainability investing company and launched the VC wing of it.
Harry Forbes: Since founding Emerald, you have seen a lot of new green technologies, such as smart-sensor technology and biological pest management. From your perspective, is there a certain technology, such as solar or carbon capture, utilization, and storage [CCUS], that is changing how people think about sustainability investing?
Gina Domanig: In the case of solar, it used to be subsidy-driven but then developed its own stand-alone economic value, with no need for support from the government. This strengthened its value proposition. Corporations saw this trend as an encouraging signal to invest in sustainable-energy solutions.
Meanwhile, CCUS, direct air capture, and hydrogen (for most applications) aren’t there yet, but as these technologies continue to innovate, we will likely see the cost curve decrease dramatically as well. VCs can fund these companies at the point where their breakthroughs become economically competitive and environmentally impactful.
Key insight #2: Create a clear structure for intellectual property creation.
Gisa Springer: In your experience, what distinguishes industrial technology venture capital from general venture capital?
Gina Domanig founded Emerald Technology Ventures as the first independent cleantech venture capital fund in Europe in 2000 and now serves as its managing partner. Gina currently serves on the boards of Basel Agency for Sustainable Energy, Die Mobiliar, actnano Ltd., GeoDigital International, Inc., and Urgent.ly, Inc. She also serves on the advisory board of the Danish Innovation Fund as well as the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Food and Water Security, and is the co-chair of innovation at the World Energy Council. Prior to founding Emerald, she was senior vice president at Sulzer, a Swiss multinational where she was responsible for strategic planning and M&A.
Gina Domanig: Emerald has seen many corporations try to pivot to develop or invest in green technologies. They understand they cannot rely exclusively on their own R&D capacity to drive their business goals. The type of tech that corporations need to adopt to achieve their climate commitments may have nothing to do with their core business. This is why we use open innovation as a way to look at a new idea from the corporation’s perspective. For example, if a food company makes a sustainability commitment for wastewater, it may need to bring in technology from an external partner, such as a start-up. The corporation can either be the start-up’s customer or partner to access customers. This duality is what sets the industrial technology VC industry apart from more general VC, because start-ups often require corporate collaboration to access established market channels.
Harry Forbes: How do you navigate the delicate balance between protecting intellectual property [IP] and fostering collaboration between corporations and start-ups?
Gina Domanig: Companies have a natural tendency to protect their IP and technology. When first collaborating with start-ups, corporations had unrealistic expectations about IP. For example, they might have thought they had first right of refusal to buy the start-up or could gain ownership of IP if the start-up did not deliver on milestones. To address these concerns, at Emerald, we created a structured framework that ensures clarity in IP ownership end to end.
For instance, a US corporation we’ve done many investments with no longer asks for exclusivity. Instead, it asks for an 18-month head start, meaning the start-up will not supply the product on a commercial basis to any competitors during that time. Meanwhile, we as investors see that the corporation has incentives to move fast, and the start-up benefits because it can continue with testing, piloting, and fine-tuning technology.
Key insight #3: Understand what metrics matter and when to be flexible.
Gisa Springer: What process and criteria do you use for selecting and nurturing potential future green unicorns?
Leap by McKinsey works with established organizations to imagine, build, and scale new businesses—and develop the capabilities needed to do it again and again. We bring together a global network of experts to build dynamic, innovative businesses that can reinvigorate entire organizations.
Learn more about Leap by McKinsey.
Gina Domanig: When one of our sector specialists, who are experts in their fields, says a start-up has potential, we have a deal team look at the company’s financials, management, and other pertinent factors to assess its viability and suitability for investment.
We prefer early commercialization because it gives us insight into whether management has a functional business model and a successful go-to-market strategy. We typically have a four- to five-year timeline to exit, but we can also invest for longer. We’ve had successful exits after 12 years. Other times, we exited so quickly that an employee stock-ownership plan wasn’t even in place. With different windows of opportunity, we react based on what is attractive.
Key insight #4: Make investments based on economic viability, not market conditions.
Harry Forbes: How do you think sustainability start-ups and investors can succeed in today’s complex climate?
Gina Domanig: It helps that we have been through these cycles before, such as during the recent special-purpose acquisition company [SPAC] trend or the boom in the mid-2000s. Since then, people have become more realistic and have come to understand that they cannot take $200 million to achieve breakeven. At Emerald, we dramatically pulled back on investment during the SPAC years because we felt that valuations were too high. Now that they are lower, we have doubled our investment pace.
Gisa Springer: What advice would you give to the next generation of green founders and VCs?
Gina Domanig: While our primary goal is to create a more sustainable future, we must also acknowledge the business aspects of our efforts. It’s easy to deploy capital; the hard part is getting it back. It can be challenging to know what the economic cycle is going to be when you need to raise your next fund. Understanding a start-up’s ability to generate cash and breakeven is key. In our experience, companies can be more successful when they address both their economic viability and their potential to drive transformative change in the world.
Gina Domanig is the managing partner and founder of Emerald Technology Ventures. Harry Forbes is a consultant in McKinsey’s London office, where Gisa Springer is a partner.
Comments and opinions expressed by interviewees are their own and do not represent or reflect the opinions, policies, or positions of McKinsey & Company or have its endorsement.
source
Premium Domain Names:
A premium domain name is a highly sought-after domain that is typically short, memorable, and contains popular keywords or phrases. These domain names are considered valuable due to their potential to attract more organic traffic and enhance branding efforts. Premium domain names are concise and usually consist of one to two words or two to four individual characters.
Top-Level Domain Names for Sale on Crocodom.com:
If you are looking for top-level domain names for sale, you can visit Crocodom.com. Crocodom.com is a platform that offers a selection of domain names at various price ranges. It is important to note that the availability of specific domain names may vary, and it’s recommended to check the website for the most up-to-date information.
Contact at crocodomcom@gmail.com:
If you have any inquiries or need assistance regarding the domain names available on Crocodom.com, you can reach out to them via email at crocodomcom@gmail.com. Feel free to contact them for any questions related to the domain names or the purchasing process.
Availability on Sedo.com, Dan.com, and Afternic.com:
Apart from Crocodom.com, you can also explore other platforms like Sedo.com, Dan.com, and Afternic.com for available domain names. These platforms are popular marketplaces for buying and selling domain names. Each platform may have its own inventory of domain names, so it’s worth checking multiple sources to find the perfect domain name for your needs.
#PremiumDomains #DomainInvesting #DigitalAssets #DomainMarketplace #DomainFlipping #BrandableDomains #DomainBrokers #DomainAcquisition #DomainPortfolio #DomainIndustry #DomainAuctions #DomainInvestors #DomainSales #DomainExperts #DomainValue #DomainBuyers #DomainNamesForSale #DomainBrand #DomainInvestment #DomainTrading
+ There are no comments
Add yours