the cost of investing in the energy transition in a high interest-rate era – Wood Mackenzie – CROCODOM.com

Premium Domain Names for Sale at CrocoDom.com
wn1sdwk000IN4
Sign-in to our platforms to access our extensive research, our latest insight, data and analytics and to connect to our industry experts.
Conflicts of interest
The cost of investing in the energy transition in a high interest-rate era

Peter Martin, Head of Economics, Macroeconomics
Join the debate. Contact Peter.
Peter Martin
Head of Economics, Macroeconomics
Peter joined Wood Mackenzie in 2010 to cover European energy markets and moved to the macroeconomics research team in 2011. He now leads the team responsible for producing our proprietary economic outlook to 2050, drawing on his experience in forecasting key metrics such as GDP, industrial production, FX and inflation.
Peter regularly develops macroeconomic scenarios and sensitivity analysis, including Brexit, banking crises, the Covid-19 pandemic and trade wars. He has also contributed to consulting projects, assessing the economic impact of energy and natural resources development. His special interests include the economics of energy transition and the fiscal stability of oil-producing economies in the Middle East and Africa.
Before joining Wood Mackenzie, Peter was an energy analyst at Iberdrola. In this role, he provided technical and fundamental analysis of European energy markets to the trading desk.
Education
MA (Hons) Economics, the University of Glasgow
MSc Economic Management and Policy, Strathclyde Business School
James Whiteside, Head of Corporate, Metals & Mining
Join the debate. Contact James.
James Whiteside
Head of Corporate, Metals & Mining
James leads the development of corporate coverage for metals and mining. His current focus is on providing data-driven analysis of companies’ positioning for the energy transition and implications for valuation. He is based in London.
In previous leadership roles at Wood Mackenzie, James set the metals and mining product strategy. He led cross-commodity research initiatives and the development of new products including our metals and mining Emissions Benchmarking Tool.
James joined Wood Mackenzie in 2015 as a consultant. He has 15 years of experience in the metals and mining industry, spanning commercial, technical and financial roles. As a consultant, he managed several major transaction advisory engagements and was instrumental in developing our battery raw materials offerings.
Education
MSc, Metals and Energy Finance, Imperial College London
MEng, Civil Engineering, University of Leeds
Fraser McKay, Head of Upstream Analysis
Join the debate. Contact Fraser.
Fraser McKay
Head of Upstream Analysis
As head of our Upstream Research team, Fraser is responsible for maximising the quality and impact of our analysis of key global upstream themes.
Fraser joined Wood Mackenzie in 2003, initially as an upstream analyst leading our offering in Canada and Alaska. Since then he has managed research teams focused on delivering in-depth, strategic corporate and upstream analysis and played a key role in building out our Americas upstream and corporate research capacity. Fraser has also played a key role in the development of a suite of products, including our M&A Service, Corporate Benchmarking Tool and Mid-Cap Corporate Coverage.
In his senior roles, Fraser has managed and contributed to major strategic consulting projects, interacted with client executive teams and government entities at the most senior level, and presented upstream and corporate material to global audiences.
Prior to joining Wood Mackenzie, Fraser worked for Schlumberger in various field and managerial positions in the oilfield services sector.
Srinivasan Santhakumar, Senior Research Analyst, Offshore Wind
Join the debate. Contact Srinivasan .
Srinivasan Santhakumar
Senior Research Analyst, Offshore Wind
Srinivasan is a senior research analyst in our offshore wind team, involved in economic analysis with a particular focus on asset valuation, LCOE forecasts and market research. He also works on the cost modelling of offshore wind energy, analysing how technological advancements, performance and macroeconomic factors translate into cost impacts.
Srinivasan joined Wood Mackenzie in 2022 and is based in Amsterdam. 
Education
MSc, Sustainable Energy Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology & Barcelona Tech
PhD, Offshore Renewable Energy Technologies, University of Groningen
The ‘zero era’ for interest rates has come to an end. In the past two years, rates have risen sharply as central banks have scrambled to fight inflationary pressures. Governments, companies and households face markedly higher market rates and bond yields, which could yet rise further. The increase in the cost of capital has profound implications for the energy and natural resources industries, particularly the cost and pace of the transition to low-carbon technologies.
The monetary environment over the next couple of decades is likely to remain much tighter than it was in the period from 2009 to 2022. In major economies, nominal and real interest rates could be as much as two percentage points higher, on average, than in the ‘zero era’. Companies, investors and policymakers should brace themselves: tougher financial conditions could persist for some time to come.
The higher cost of borrowing affects the energy and natural resources sectors unevenly. Highly capital intensive and often reliant on subsidies, low-carbon energy and nascent green technologies are most exposed. Debt accounts for a higher share of the capital structure for low-carbon energy sectors, too. The impact of higher interest rates grows as the capital expenditure (capex) share of total expenditure increases.
In contrast, the oil and gas industry, while also highly capital intensive, has far less exposure to the cost of debt, so is less affected by higher rates. The large metals and mining companies, with strong balance sheets, are also well positioned.
Transitioning to a net zero global economy is a monumental investment challenge. Meeting the challenge, already an outside bet, will have to happen against a less favourable monetary backdrop than the world has been used to since 2009.  
Interest rates have normalised after the ‘zero era’, the period of loose monetary policy that followed the Great Recession. In 2023, policy rates in major developed economies hit their highest levels in decades after the most aggressive hiking cycle in 40 years. While inflation has fallen towards central banks’ targets of around 2%, rates may not come down as far or as quickly as markets anticipate.
Structural inflationary trends ‒ global trade reshuffling, deglobalisation and production onshoring ‒ are intensifying. Safeguarding the security of supply and protecting domestic industry and employment are being prioritised over economics. On the demand side, the energy transition will stimulate demand and, in some cases, even put upward pressure on inflation by shifting to higher-cost, low-carbon technologies.
To keep inflation averaging around 2%, therefore, higher nominal interest rates could persist. China is an exception, as its maturing economic development and lower growth are likely to translate into lower interest rates.
The energy transition to net zero could require US$75 trillion of investment by 2050. In a higher interest-rate scenario, achieving net zero will be even harder and more costly.
The higher cost of borrowing affects energy and natural resources sectors differently. Capital structure and balance-sheet resilience determine sensitivity to interest rates.
Thanks to their low gearing, many companies in the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors will be relatively unaffected by higher interest rates.
Gearing is higher for power and renewables firms. Debt from bonds and project finance, secured against long-term power purchasing agreements, has been used to fund rapid growth in renewables. Renewables and nuclear power, with their high capital intensity, are more exposed to interest rates . Project finance is less common in the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors, with the notable exceptions of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and midstream projects, where more stable revenues suit the financing model.
While power and renewables companies have higher gearing, they do compare favourably with other peer groups on a cost-of-debt basis. Mechanisms to reduce price and offtake risk enable power and renewables companies to obtain debt more cheaply than the relatively risky oil and gas and metals and mining sectors. The recent rise in interest rates, however, has a larger proportional impact on their cost of debt.
Higher interest rates disproportionately affect renewables and nuclear power. Their high capital intensity and low returns mean future projects will be at risk.
Renewable investments with subsidies and certainty on price and offtake can access cheaper finance, but the low cost of debt and low required returns are precisely what makes projects sensitive to interest rates. Higher interest rates affect required returns and the cost of capital more than other power generation projects that need higher returns in the first place.
In an illustrative example for the US, our analysis shows that a 2-percentage point increase in the risk-free interest rate pushes up the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) by as much as 20% for renewables. The comparative increase in LCOE for a combined-cycle gas turbine plant is only 11%.
The market structure matters, too. In the US and Australia, where renewables, including subsidies, must compete against the market price, higher interest rates will curb investment. In Europe, in contrast – where the mandate is to achieve decarbonisation targets and contracts for difference reduce price risk – investments are still likely to go ahead but result in higher prices.
We are seeing this play out. Offshore wind projects typically fix power purchasing agreements for 15 to 20 years ahead. Those projects that secured agreements three to four years ago are under pressure. Completed projects are booking impairments after razor-thin margins were squeezed by cost inflation, supply-chain constraints and the rising cost of capital. Some projects in development are being scrapped and some power contracts are being renegotiated.
How competitive are renewables? In many markets, onshore wind and solar have an economic advantage over hydrocarbon generation sources, even without subsidies in some cases. In the US, onshore wind can generate electricity at an LCOE of US$40/MWh, 50% of the cost of gas-fired generation. Higher interest rates, though, are eroding that advantage.
Nascent technologies – low-carbon hydrogen, carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) and direct air capture (DAC) – will play an important role in the energy transition. However, they require major development and incentives to transform them into commercially viable, large-scale options for energy supply or decarbonising the economy.
With their remarkable levels of capital investment and high capital intensity, these projects are under threat amid higher interest rates. The capital intensity of hydrogen varies greatly by project, with capex ranging from 20% to 75% of total cost. At higher capital intensities, a 2-percentage point increase in interest rates lifts the levelised cost of hydrogen by around 10%.
The lack of economic incentives to capture carbon and the lack of a market for hydrogen are the most significant obstacles to investment in these sectors, but for projects that do progress, higher interest rates hurt the economics. This affects both smaller development companies that struggle to access debt and larger, credit-worthy emitters that rely on low-interest leverage to render projects attractive for shareholders.
The oil and gas sector has less to fear in a tighter interest-rate environment. After record debt repayment in the last few years, the average balance sheet is healthy and gearing is low. Net debt for 25 of the largest international and national oil companies in Wood Mackenzie’s corporate coverage fell to US$150 billion in 2023 from US$390 billion in 2020. Gearing of 10% to 20% is already the ‘new normal’ for many and will be reinforced in a higher interest-rate era.
 
Our analysis shows that a 2-percentage point interest-rate increase has a similar effect on total corporate cash flow as a modest US$1/bbl change in the oil price. While the cost of capital is an ever-present consideration, interest rates are far from a primary concern. Rather, the availability of finance is a problem for small or financially stretched operators, with environmental, social and governance concerns contributing to an ever-shrinking list of lenders.
When it comes to decisions on capital allocation and project sanctioning, higher interest rates could impact investment sentiment. The cost of capital is baked into the 15%-plus return targets the industry’s biggest players expect from oil projects. The cost of equity is also a factor but, even in isolation, interest rates could impact investment models to a degree.
One area that embraces project financing and where rising interest rates have caused some concern is LNG. On a value basis, the sector accounts for 12% of the global oil and gas industry. Capital is raised with the project itself acting as collateral to access cheaper finance.
LNG projects already operating will have either partly or fully paid down or repackaged their project finance. New projects are more exposed. The burgeoning US LNG sector accounts for most of the new tolling capacity. Increasing development costs and higher interest rates have already caused a US$0.30-US$0.40/mmbtu increase in tolling fees ‒ around a 20% rise. A structural 2-percentage point increase in interest rates would permanently lock in more than half of that. These higher costs would mostly be passed through to the consumer.
Mining companies are running very low levels of debt and look well-positioned for a high-rate environment. High capital requirements are limiting new project sanctioning and hampering extraction growth, however.
For the mining Majors, we don’t think a higher-for-longer interest-rate environment will alter their approach. A focus on low-cost assets to protect margins, minimise earnings volatility and boost credit ratings is entrenched.
Things might start to get tricky for mining projects that require dedicated project finance. The scale of copper and aluminium projects presents a significant hurdle for independent developers. Debt interest payments will be higher, lowering the coverage ratio of projects and limiting the amount of borrowed capital available. This may force independents to consider alternative financing options or partner with the Majors to derisk project execution.
The mining industry faces a challenge in meeting metals demand in the energy transition. Capital intensity has reached a point where growing output is difficult. This is the conundrum for the mining industry.
By further suppressing output growth in the short term, higher rates may help underpin a shift to growth as the energy transition accelerates. Eventually as demand grows, price rises will kick in and support a shift to growth for the mining and metals sector.
Governments need to subsidise the energy transition to encourage investment. But high interest rates put those subsidies at risk. With elevated debt and higher interest rates, governments’ debt servicing costs are increasing. This squeezes out other government spending and could restrict transition efforts by reducing supportive subsidies and tax incentives or cutting direct public capital investment in a low-carbon economy.
In the US, government expenditure on interest payments as a percentage of GDP has risen by 1.2 percentage points to 3.7% since the start of 2022; US$1 of every US$7 spent goes on interest. Budget trade-offs are a reality. The US Inflation Reduction Act could total US$1.8 trillion in subsidies to the power sector alone by 2050.
What’s playing out in China now may reflect the constraints other governments could soon experience. Public debt in China as a percentage of GDP has doubled over the past decade. The central government stopped subsidising new renewable power capacity in 2022, yet legacy subsidy payments to the renewables sector are climbing fast, rising from RMB40 billion in 2022 to RMB100 billion (US$14 billion) in 2023. As of 2021, subsidy arrears stood at RMB400 billion, as eligible projects outstripped available funding. China could struggle to support subsidies in future.
What can policymakers do? The higher-rate environment is a headwind to the energy transition globally, so it is imperative that they remove other barriers to transition. We see three priorities:
If higher interest rates persist, transitioning to net zero will be even more challenging. Nascent low-carbon technologies, exposed to higher rates, could cost more. Meanwhile, traditional hydrocarbon energy sources and the mining sector look to have a financing cost advantage.
Rising interest payments and debt constraints risk limiting the public sector’s ability to contribute to financing the energy transition, either directly by capital investment or through subsidies and tax credits.
Consumers and end users of energy and commodities are likely to pay more. And the transition to net zero will be delayed even further. Action is required to avoid, or at least mitigate, such an outcome. For investors and companies, strict capital discipline will remain in focus in a prolonged period of higher rates.
Policymakers need to act to offset the interest-rate headwinds. Removing obstacles such as slow permitting and project approval and offering clear, consistent and sustained incentives will support nascent low-carbon technologies. Strengthening global carbon markets, maximising subsidy efficiency and mobilising green finance are also essential. A higher interest-rate environment might be what it takes to get policymakers to spring into action.
Stay updated with the freshest insights and news from Wood Mackenzie’s team of global analysts. 
Loading…
Inspiring natural
resources decisions.

source
Premium Domain Names:

A premium domain name is a highly sought-after domain that is typically short, memorable, and contains popular keywords or phrases. These domain names are considered valuable due to their potential to attract more organic traffic and enhance branding efforts. Premium domain names are concise and usually consist of one to two words or two to four individual characters.

Top-Level Domain Names for Sale on Crocodom.com:

If you are looking for top-level domain names for sale, you can visit Crocodom.com. Crocodom.com is a platform that offers a selection of domain names at various price ranges. It is important to note that the availability of specific domain names may vary, and it’s recommended to check the website for the most up-to-date information.

Contact at crocodomcom@gmail.com:

If you have any inquiries or need assistance regarding the domain names available on Crocodom.com, you can reach out to them via email at crocodomcom@gmail.com. Feel free to contact them for any questions related to the domain names or the purchasing process.

Availability on Sedo.com, Dan.com, and Afternic.com:

Apart from Crocodom.com, you can also explore other platforms like Sedo.com, Dan.com, and Afternic.com for available domain names. These platforms are popular marketplaces for buying and selling domain names. Each platform may have its own inventory of domain names, so it’s worth checking multiple sources to find the perfect domain name for your needs.

#PremiumDomains #DomainInvesting #DigitalAssets #DomainMarketplace #DomainFlipping #BrandableDomains #DomainBrokers #DomainAcquisition #DomainPortfolio #DomainIndustry #DomainAuctions #DomainInvestors #DomainSales #DomainExperts #DomainValue #DomainBuyers #DomainNamesForSale #DomainBrand #DomainInvestment #DomainTrading